MUST READ!

"Open adoption and open records are important byways. But they are not the most compelling route. Family preservation is."
Dr. Randolph Severson,
The Soul of Family Preservation

“Regrettably, in many cases, the emphasis has changed from the desire to provide a needy child with a home, to that of providing a needy parent with a child. As a result, a whole industry has grown, generating millions of dollars of revenues each year . . .”

The Special Rapporteur, United Nations, Commission on Human Rights, 2003.

"Over the past 30 years, the number of families from wealthy countries wanting to adopt children from other countries has grown substantially. At the same time, lack of regulation and oversight, particularly in the countries of origin, coupled with the potential for financial gain, has spurred the growth of an industry around adoption, where profit, rather than the best interests of children, takes centre stage. Abuses include the sale and abduction of children, coercion of parents, and bribery."
UNICEF's position on Inter-country adoption
.

"...overseas adoption is a kind of child abuse by the state. ....Overseas adoption is the forced expulsion of children from the society where they are supposed to live. In this sense, overseas adoption is a social violence against children. As humans, we exist as part of a gigantic ecosystem. The existence of the biological parents of adoptees can never be annihilated nor denied.
"Overseas adoption is a forced separation of children from their natural ecosystems, as well as a way of forcing them into compulsory unity with settings different from and unnatural to their genetic and original social systems. Through this forced separation and compulsory unity, not only the adoptees, but also their biological parents, adoptive parents and their family members suffer trauma." Pastor Kim Do-hyun, director of KoRoot

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

It's Infertility Awareness Week

What is this graphic saying? Clearly the message is that if you can't have a kid of your own...after trying...the booby prize is adoption!  And a kid of color is the newest "in" thing this season! 

The photo leaves us with little doubt that the smiling lady did NOT "resolve" her infertility medically!

Adoption does not resolve infertility.

According to the Mayo Clinic, approximately 15 percent of married heterosexual couples are infertile. It do s not include singles and same sex couples also seeking to be parents.

Infertility awareness should be focusing on these PREVENTION measures:

1. Delaying childbirth into your is risky business. Pregnancy is possible, but...
  • A number of different problems characterize the ability to achieve pregnancy over 35. There is a noticeable decline in the fertility rate starting at age 35 to a level of about 10% per month.
  • he pregnancy risk over 35 is higher as well as evidenced an increase in the miscarriage rate and the incidence of genetic abnormality in pregnancy. At 35, the miscarriage rate is 25% and the risk of Down syndrome becomes about 1/350. 35 is the age at which genetic testing in pregnancy is first recommended since the chance of picking up an abnormality is greater than the risk of the procedure used to find it.
  • There is a sharp decline in a woman’s ability to achieve pregnancy over age forty. The fertility rate per month is only about 5% and even with in Vitro Fertilization (IVF), the most successful infertility treatment available, the pregnancy rate is only about 10% per try. This is due to the greatly reduced number of normal eggs remaining in the ovaries of a woman over forty. 
  • Estimates from embryo biopsy reveal that at least 90% of a woman’s eggs are genetically abnormal when a woman is over 40. This is explains the increased pregnancy risk over 40. The miscarriage rate is 33% at age 40. Genetically abnormal pregnancies are more common as well with an incidence of 1/38 at age 40.
  • Women over 45 have less than a 1% chance of getting pregnant using their own eggs.
  • Research also shows that older women who have recently given birth are more likely to develop breast cancer in the 15 years following the birth than their peers of the same age who have never had children.
2. Smoking cigarettes or marijuana increases infertility, especially by reducing sperm counts.

3. Obesity or being too thin increase infertility. A body weight close to the ideal for your height to reduce the possibility of hormone imbalances. This is very important for men as well as for women.

4. Excessive alcohol consumption is may damage eggs or sperm.

5. Environmental contaminants and chemical exposure is a risk factor. 

6. STDs that go undetected and untreated can damage the reproductive system and cause infertility. If you think you may have an STD, get treatment promptly to reduce the risk of damage to your reproductive system. Make sure you know how to use a male condom and/or how to use a female condom.
  •  Chlamydia and gonorrhea are important preventable causes of infertility. Untreated, about 10-15% of women with chlamydia will develop pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Chlamydia can also cause fallopian tube infection without any symptoms. PID and “silent” infection in the upper genital tract may cause permanent damage to the fallopian tubes, uterus, and surrounding tissues, which can lead to infertility.
  • An estimated 2.8 million cases of chlamydia and 718,000 cases of gonorrhea occur annually in the United States.
  • Most women infected with chlamydia or gonorrhea have no symptoms.
  • CDC recommends annual chlamydia screening for all sexually active females 25 and under and for women older than 25 with risk factors such as a new sex partner or multiple partners.
7. Male infertility accounts for 40-50% of all infertility, according to wikipedia. The Mayo Clinic however reports that in about 20 percent of cases, infertility is due to a cause involving only the male partner. In about 30 to 40 percent of cases, infertility is due to causes involving both the male and female. In the remaining 40 to 50 percent of cases, infertility is due entirely to a cause involving the female.
  • Drugs, alcohol and smoking play a major role as does strenuous bike and horseback riding.
  • Anabolic steroids taken to stimulate muscle strength and growth can cause the testicles to shrink and sperm production to decrease.
  • Often treatable, problems with sexual intercourse or technique may affect fertility. Difficulties with erection of the penis (erectile dysfunction), premature ejaculation, painful intercourse (dyspareunia), or psychological or relationship problems can contribute to infertility. Use of lubricants such as oils or petroleum jelly can be toxic to sperm and impair fertility.
  • As in women, malnutrition and obesity are factor sin male infertility.
  • Often disregarded, the age of the male partner IS also a factor. Men older than age 40 may be less fertile than younger men, according to the Mayo Clinic.
This should be a required part of every HS student's health classes!  

Decreased fertility in and of itself might actually be a blessing, as the planet is reaching a population of 7 billion; 9 billion by 2045 according to National Geographics, Dec. 2010. But in industrialized countries, which have lower birth rates to begin with, the infertile community turns to medical science for "cures" and when that fails, they turn to adoption.

The fact that the birth rate is far higher in less industrialized parts of the world means a continued flow of children from there to here...as illustrated in the graphic above.,.all justified by the persistent rescue and better life mythology that pervades adoption.

The current mind-set is, well, you can always "just" adopt!  This MUST change! Not only does it create demand for babies that are too often filled with exploitation, coercion, and corruption including kidnapping and stealing babies to be trafficked for adoption, it does NOT resolve infertility and often leads to children being raised by people for whom they are a disappointment that will never measure up to the fantasy baby they never were able to have. This in turn leads to child abuse and terminated adoptions.

We must stop financing the multi-billion dollar infertility industry AND the multi-billion dollar adoption industry. This can be accomplished through prevention education.  THAT and that alone is what infertility awareness should be about.

Adoption must return to being about finding homes for children in REAL need, not filling a demand! Morality and ethics demand it.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

What about those who were unable to "prevent" their infertility? What do they do, then? Are you against all infertility treatments?

I'm all for education, and I agree that adoption does not resolve infertility. As an infertile woman I am always offended when people say "just adopt" as we have decided that is not an option for us due to the ethical issues, some of which you've spoken about.
But how about making infertility treatment affordable? How about forcing insurance companies to cover IVF and treat the underlying causes of infertility, most of which are not covered? Wouldn't that reduce "demand" for adoption? What are your ideas for the already infertile?

Mirah Riben said...

Glad you agree that adoption is not the solution!

No, I am not "against" medical treatment for anyone for any cause. As for insurance coverage, I would insist upon limits. I do NOT think we all need to share the outrageous expenses incurred when infertility treatments result in women birthing LITERS of underweight preemies that require NICU care at THOUSANDS a DAY! And that's not the end of it. Many of those preemies will need special ed and that burdens the taxpayers for 18 years for each child. Many need one-on-one care all throughout school! The burden to society because someone could not just accept being infertile is unconscionable and way out of proportion IMHO.

Nor do I believe we should all share the cost of EVERYONE who seeks to become pregnant, such as women in their 50 and 60s...the latest I read was ZsaZsa Gabor's husband wanting to give her a surrogate baby before she dies! PREPOSTEROUS!!

NO. I do not support those things. But it is not not my issue. If it's yours, I encourage you to pursue it.

I merely want to reduce infertility that IS preventable and thereby reduce some of the demand-driven adoption that commodifies children and exploits their families' tragedies. As you may notice the name of my blog is Family Preservation. That's where I am coming from. Treating disease is way out of my expertise. But then infertility is not a disease...though it is sometimes the result of one.

Fact is - and you won't like to hear this - but in the past, people simply ACCEPTED being childless as God's will. Now, they snatch up kids and try to pretend that God wanted them to have someone else's kid. A bit convoluted and far fetched!

I wish you the best of luck campaigning for whatever changes you wish to see. And thanks for knowing that adoption is corrupt more often than not.

Susie said...

Amen Mirah! Great post.

I am sorry for the women who suffer infertility. However, as you said, adoption does not cure infertility.

It saddens me that the words of those who suffer from adoption loss (the mothers, natural families, and the adopted) are ignored and adoption is still glorified by most as a "cure" for infertility and gay couples who want to parent a child.

Mirah Riben said...

I forgot somethign very important. I am also totally opposed to and would not support insurance coverage for any infertility treatment that involved the ANONYMOUS buying and selling of eggs or sperm.

I, too, feel compassion for those unable to bear children. I do. I likewise feel compassion for those who lose limbs, their vision, etc...but I would not donate a limb or an eye while I'm living! And neither my limbs nor my eyes would feel abandoned if I did.

KRT said...

Agreed, but to answer the first poster, while I have compassion for those who desire children and are unable to produce them, I cannot support mandatory insurance coverage for infertility/pregnancy treatment.

Pregnancy and childbearing are not 'health issues' in the sense that you will not survive without doing so, or that you will be crippled without treatment. These are options in life.

Yes, it may hurt tremendously to never fulfill that desire, but people deal with unfulfilled dreams and loss of those dreams every day.

No one owes anyone a kid, and the insurance pool that pays for infertility treatment will skyrocket the rates for the rest of us. Not right.

If an infertile couple not having a child would lead to loss of life or limb, sure, ok. But that simply isn't the situation.

Mirah Riben said...

KRT - health insurance pays for many non-life-threatening conditions from the common cold to preventative care such as MRI. So that is not a generally used criteria. However, there need to be limits as I suggested:

1. No insurance coverage for anonymous sale or purchases of sperm or eggs, including the extraction when the so-called "donor" is being paid;

2. No ins coverage for procedures which implant mutliple eggs and can result in the birth of more than twins;

3. No ins coverage for freezing unused fertilized eggs as these then get "adopted" anonymously!

We need these limitations to protect the children being created as well as to keep control of skyrocketing health costs!

RussiaToday Apr 29, 2010 on Russian Adoption Freeze

Russi Today: America television Interview 4/16/10 Regarding the Return of Artyem, 7, to Russia alone

RT: Russia-America TV Interview 3/10

Korean Birthmothers Protest to End Adoption

Motherhood, Adoption, Surrender, & Loss

Who Am I?

Bitter Winds

Adoption and Truth Video

Adoption Truth

Birthparents Never Forget