Saturday, October 9, 2010

Be AWARE of the TRUTH of Adoption

November is Adoption Awareness Month.  It seems a fitting time for all in the adoption community with blogs to post the REALITIES.

In your own words, as an adoptee, adoptive parent or mother of a child she was convinced to relinquish...TELL IT LIKE IT IS!

** All during the month of November use your blog and write letters to the editors of your local newspapers sharing YOUR TRUTH about adoption. Help combat the industries push to promote unnecessary family separations, and more pain and loss! Help stop commodifying children to meet a demand and fatten the pockets of baby brokers and child traffickers! Help STOP THE INSANITY and support Family Preservation. And help restore EQUAL... ACCESS for adoption separated people who are discriminated against! Stop falsified birth certificates!

It's a mockery for the U.SA, to declare National Adoption Awareness Month when those of us living with adoption are DENIED any awareness of our own truth!! When we are forced to live in the dark, shrouded by secrets and lies, "protected" from one another.

RAISE YOUR VOICES as the TRUE EXPERTS: those who live with adoption...those whose lives have been changed irrevocably by it; victims of a bizarre human experiment promoted by a lucrative industry.

** Head your blog post with the words "Truth in Adoption" and use that phrase as a keyword.

** Send links to your blog posts and published letters so we can all cross post!

Lots of blogging will get the media's attention!

A wonderful blog from last year: http://www.mantlethought.org/content/are-you-aware

* * * * IN ADDITION: * * * * Organize IN-PERSON DEMONSTRATIONS at your state building, or local NOW or ACLU, or the NCFA Hdqrtrs - anywhere locally appropriate ON NOVEMBER 20 - National Adoption DAY! She details here! And be sure to send out PRESS RELEASES for your event. 
Attract the media. !! Do street theater. Wear costumes. Come in chains.

** ALSO: Sponsor an Awareness of Truth in Adoption night at your local library! Compile a list of suggested books and ask the library to have as many as possible on hand. Compile information sheets listing website and places to access the TRUTH. See http://AdoptionResourceCenter.org/

FORWARD MESSAGE WIDELY!!!  SPREAD THE WORD!!! 

If enough of us participate it will generate media attention.

Stay in the loop on all related events and to share your links via Facebook.

WIN FOR GRAYSON & BEN!!

Late Breaking News: "The Vaughns have signed new papers agreeing to give Grayson Wyrembek back to his father, Benjamin Wyrembek, by the end of the month, never to see him again, and to drop all further resistance to the law and justice and to stop trying to take this child from his Ohio family.
Pray it's true and conformed shortly...
REPORTED: October 8, 2010 at 10:46 PM
(WHAS11)  Unwilling to surrender in their fight to adopt the boy they have raised since he was an infant, a Southern Indiana couple may never see three-year-old Grayson Vaughn again after the end of October. 

What a choice for the Vaughns on Friday behind closed doors in a judge’s chambers.  As described by Ed Vaughn, Jason’s father, they are risking never seeing Grayson again in order to hold on to whatever chance they might have to become his adoptive parents.

So Friday, there was another setback for the Southern Indiana couple; Ed Vaughn told us mediation had failed.   The court wanted to make mediation contingent on the Vaughn’s dropping the adoption; they refused.

Speaking by phone from Toledo, where Grayson is in extended visits with his biological father, Ed Vaughn said they threatened to take Grayson if they didn’t agree to the terms and they would take him today.  “I’ve never seen judges threaten to take people’s kids if they don’t do what they’re told, and have them sign mediated agreements where they have to sign that they weren’t coerced.  You know, it feels to me like North Korea, or some communist country.   We’re all relieved right now.  We’re all relieved that we get to leave here this weekend with Grayson,” said Ed Vaughn.

Ed Vaughn told us it would not be surprising if Grayson had to stay in Ohio.  Another hearing was held late Friday afternoon, but there had been no word yet on what happened in that court proceeding.
  
UNCONFIRMED: The judge had both sides in his chambers. Ben Wyrembek offered the Vaughns visitation of Grayson and to still see him sometimes (similiar to Grandparents right).  They said they wanted all or nothing.  So the judge said there will be a transition period.  Ben will have Grayson on the weekends and the Vaughns during the week days and at the end of the month Grayson will be with his dad solely.
 

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Prayers For Grayson and Ben's Reunion

Ohio Supreme Court will not reconsider decision in Vaughn adoption case

High court lifts stay on all lower court proceedings


CLARK COUNTY — The Ohio Supreme Court on Thursday denied a request to reconsider its ruling that has resulted in a Sellersburg couple being ordered to return a nearly 3-year-old child they have raised since birth to his biological father.

The court further lifted a stay on all lower court proceedings that it granted on Sept. 28, allowing Christy and Jason Vaughn to temporarily keep custody of their son, Grayson.

In September, a juvenile court in Ohio ordered Grayson be returned to his biological father, Benjamin Wyrembek, in northern Ohio after it had determined he was legally the father. The Supreme Court had granted a stay on that order and all other lower court decisions on Sept. 28, but the state’s high court lifted that ban Thursday meaning the order is again in effect.

The Vaughns went through an adoption agency and were matched with Grayson. The mother and his legal father at the time agreed to give Grayson up for adoption as they were going through a divorce.

The Vaughns had Grayson from the day he was born, but within 30 days after a permanent surrender agreement was executed, Wyrembek filed a paternity action claiming he was the father. The adoption had not been finalized and Wyrembek was later determined to be the biological father, setting off nearly three years of legal battles.

An Ohio probate court dismissed the Vaughns’ adoption petition, and in July, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld that ruling in a 4-3 decision.

The Vaughns have argued that the biological father’s consent was not required for adoption since he did not support the [married] mother or child.

Attorneys on both sides of the case did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

The Vaughns had previously defied a court order to return Grayson to Ohio. A hearing was held in Floyd County Circuit Court on Sept. 28 in which Judge J. Terrence Cody could have ordered that ruling enforced. The Vaughns signed a statement at that hearing last month that they would no longer discuss the case in the media.

Friends of the family have indicated that both parties agreed to mediation at the Circuit Court hearing.

Check later at www.newsandtribune.com and in tomorrow’s editions of the Evening News and Tribune for more information.

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

About Women’s Secrets and Shame…

Excerpted from Women Who Run With the Wolves by Clarissa Pinkola Estes, Chapter 13, Battle Scars: Membership in the Scar Clan pgs. 374-7.

Tears are a river that take you somewhere. Weeping creates a river around the boat that carries your soul-life. Tears lift your boar off the rocks, off dry ground, carrying it downriver to someplace new, someplace better.

There are oceans of tears women have never cried, for they have been trained to carry mother’s and father’s secrets, men’s secrets, society’ secrets, and their own secrets, to the grave.  A woman’s crying has been considered quite dangerous, for it loosens the locks and blots on the secrets she bears.  But in truth, for the sake of a woman’s wild soul. It is better to cry. For women, tears are the beginning of initiation into the Scar Clan, that timeless tribe of women of all colors, all nations, all languages, who down through the ages have lived through a great something, and yet who stood proud.

All women have personal stories as vast in scope and as powerful as the numen in fairy tales.  But there is one kind of story in particular, which has to do with a woman’s secrets, especially those associated with shame; these contain some of the most important stories a woman can give her time to unraveling. For most women, these secret stories are embedded, not like jewels in a crown, but like black gravel under the skin of the soul.

Secrets as Slayers

Over my twenty-year practice, I’ve listened to thousands of “secret stories,” stories that, in the main, were kept hidden for many years, sometimes for almost a lifetime.  Whether a woman’s secret is shrouded in self-imposed silence, or whether she has been threatened by someone more powerful than she is, she deeply fears disenfranchisement, being considered an undesirable person, disruption of relationships that are important to her, and sometimes even physical harm if she reveals her secret…. [Most} women’s secrets revolve around having violated some social or moral code of their culture, religion, or personal value system.  Some of these acts, events, and choices, particularly those related to women’s freedom in any and all arenas of life, were often held out by the culture as being shamefully wrong for women, but not for men.

The problem of secret stories surrendered by shame is that they cut a woman off from her instinctive nature, which is in the main, joyous and free.  When there is a black secret in the psyche, a woman can go nowhere near it, and in fact protects herself from coming into contact with anything that will remind her of it or cause her already chronic pain to crest to an even more intense level.

This defensive maneuver is common, and, as in the aftereffects of trauma, secretly influences women’s choices in what she will or will not undertake in the outer world: which books, films, or events she will or will not involve herself with; what she will or won’t laugh about; and what interests she gives herself to. In this sense, there is entrapment of the wild nature, which should be free to do, be, look into whatever it likes.

Generally, secrets follow the same themes found in high drama. These are some of the themes of secrets: betrayal; forbidden love; unsanctioned curiosity; desperate acts; forced acts; unrequited love; jealousy and rejection; retribution and rage; cruelty to self or others; disapproved desires, wishes, and dreams; disapproved sexual interests and lifestyles; unplanned pregnancies; hatred and aggression; accidental death or injury; broken promises; loss of courage; loss of temper; incompletion of something; inability to do something; behind-the-scenes intervention and manipulation; neglect; abuse; and the list goes on, most of the themes falling under the category of the sorrowful error….

Any person who has kept a secret to her own detriment has been buried by shame. …Typically, she is powerless to aright the sad condition. She is in some way sworn or shamed into secrecy.  She complies for fear of loss of love, loss of regard, loss of basic sustenance. …

The Dead Zone

The keeping of secrets cuts a woman off from those who would give her love, succor, and protection. It causes her to carry the burden of grief and fear all by herself, and sometimes for an entire group, whether family or culture. Further, as Jung said, keeping secrets cuts us off from the unconscious. When there is a shaming secret, there is always a dead zone in the woman’s psyche, a place that does not feel or respond properly to her own continuing emotional life events or to the emotional life events of others….

A Case we all Need to Get Behind and Support!

No. 10CA0210. In re the Petition of S.D., and Concerning R.M.S. Colorado Court of Appeals -- September 30, 2010

Petitioner S.D. appealed the district court’s orders refusing to rescind her adoption by respondents. The orders were affirmed.

Respondents adopted petitioner in 1974, when petitioner was 10 months old. In October 2008, petitioner filed a motion seeking to rescind her adoption and to obtain a copy of her original birth certificate. She alleged abuse by her adoptive family and contended that in 2003, her adoptive mother confessed that the adoption was illegal because petitioner’s birth father had never relinquished his rights. Her motion was denied in November 2008. She filed similar motions in November and December 2009, which also were denied.

On appeal, petitioner requested that the court simply rescind the adoption and rule that the adoption was void because her birth father never relinquished his parental rights. The Court of Appeals held there was no right to rescind the adoption nor was it void under Colorado law. To rescind her adoption, there must be a finding that the adoption was void. The trial court did extensive research but failed to find any authority enabling it to grant petitioner’s motion.

The Court also agreed with the district court’s conclusion that the statute of limitations bars petitioner from attacking an adoption decree entered more than thirty years ago. The applicable statute of limitations at the time petitioner was adopted was two years.

Defending A Father's Rights!

Man stands up for biological father in adoption controversy

A retired paralegal is standing up for Grayson Vaughn's biological father; speaking out against an outpouring of community support for Jason and Christy Vaughn, a Sellersburg couple trying to keep the little boy they call their son.

David Houston was a paralegal for 32 years who has worked on Ohio adoption cases. He started digging into court records after hearing this one still wasn't settled after three years and said things are being mis-reported.

He says that the biological father did not show-up out of nowhere, but in fact, has tried to get his son back for almost three years now.

Grayson was born October 29, 2007. Records show his biological mother and her husband gave up their rights as parents six days later, but her husband wrote: "I am not the biological father" on the form.

On November 20, Benjamin Wyrembek registered with the Ohio Putative Father Registry because he suspected the baby could be his son.

"Because of the unique facts of the case where he has had an affair with a married woman, gotten her pregnant, I don't see anyway that Ben could have known prior to the paternity test that he was the real father," said Houston.

Just 60 days after Grayson's birth, Wyrembek filed for his parental rights in juvenile court.

"Until Ben got his paternity test, which proves that he is the real father according to Ohio law, its presumption was that the husband was the real father, even though in this particular scenario he was not," said Houston.

As Wyrembek waited on a paternity test, Jason and Christy Vaughn filed for adoption.

They argued that because Wyrembek was not legally the father at that time, Grayson was now their son.

"You have a race to the courthouse under the current law under," said Houston. "The Vaughns because they seek to adopt they only have to sprint 10 feet. Ben because he's the actual father he has to run a mile."

The courts ruled against the Vaughns, first in adoption court last year and finally in the Ohio Supreme Court in July. Houston says the child is, therefore, not legally adopted.

"At the point in time--no," said Houston. "The adoption has been denied. It was denied years ago and it stands denied today."

The Supreme Court ruled 4-3, but could reconsider its decision. Until then, we expect Grayson to stay with the Vaughns.

"They say well you know the child has bonded with the Vaughns and the Vaughns love the child and I assume the child loves the Vaughns," said Houston. "That's fine, but it doesn't mean the child won't love his natural father."

Houston is not a spokesperson for the family because both parties have agreed not to speak with the media following a hearing in September in Floyd County. [Then how does this video of their public plea exist??]

Houston did tell us that the biological father has met with the child at least once, but it ended badly after a disagreement over whom Grayson should call daddy. 

Copyright 2010 WAVE News. All rights reserved.

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Why Resume Russian Adoptions?

Moscow and Washington may soon sign an agreement guaranteeing the rights of Russian children in international adoptions with the United States.

The issue came to a head in April, when Tory Hansen sent Artyem, a seven-year-old boy she adopted from a Russian orphanage back to Moscow – on an airplane, by himself, with a note saying she could no longer parent him.

That incident touched off an international outcry and Russian adoptions to the U.S. were halted stopping the supply of the third most common source of international U.S. adoptions, behind China and Ethiopia) until an agreement guaranteeing the children’s rights had been signed. This, with more than 3,000 of these adoptions already having been started prior to the cessation.

Now, UPI reports, a Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman, Andrei Nesterenko, has indicated that an agreement between the United States and Russia “intended to provide solid guarantees of adopted children’s rights” could be signed by the end of this year, though the U.S. State Department has yet to say whether an agreement had been reached.

Guarantee and adoption in the same sentence?  Do these bureaucrats believe that's possible? How can they possibly?

And why? WHY would the Russians want to open the floodgates yet again to Americans who are responsible for more than 15 of their children murdered by American adoptive parents...between 1996 and 2009 people who PROMISED to care for these children...forever.  This is not to mention countless others who have been abused: sexually (like Masha Allen), physically: beaten, starved, burned, caged, whipped...countless others given away to other families, sent to "camps", redidential schools and ranches with othr thrown-away kids...

Another child murdered as was David Polreis?

Another Logan Higginbotham?

Another child abused to death like Viktor Matthey?

How many more will suffer and die like Luke Evans Jacob Lindorff?

Another Zachary Higier? Jessica Albina Hagmann or Maria Bennett?

More Alex Pavlis'?

Yet more Liam Thompson's and Dennis Merryman's?

Another child abused to death like Nina Hilt?

  • What steps are being taken to prevent future abuse and murders like these? 
  • What are we doing to stem the tide of this highly disproportionate number of disrupted adoptions and horrendous abuse in adoptions involving Russian children taken in by American families? 

  • What are some of the contributing issues?
  • What can learn form these failures so the past just doesn't repeat over and over?
  • When do we say these children deserve more and better than just to be taken from Russia?


If we listen...many families struggling with children adopted from Russia - and those who have given up - are telling us one common thing: they were not prepared for what they got.


What are we doing in re-opening more adoption from Russia to ensure the Russian orphanages will be more honest and parents will be better prepared regarding expectations and preparedness to deal with the behavior problems caused by fetal alcohol syndrome and institutional care?

We need to face the issues with honesty and work for realistic solutions - even if that emans making the halt of these adoptions - permanent.

These kids are not collateral damage in a billion-dollar industry!

AND,,,as if all this is not bad enough, Russia's Ombudsman for Children's Rights Pavel Astakhov states that the treaty is bilateral and Russian families may also adopt American orphans. GREAT! let's just all sawp kids! 

WE MUST STOP THE INSANITY!!!

RussiaToday Apr 29, 2010 on Russian Adoption Freeze

Russi Today: America television Interview 4/16/10 Regarding the Return of Artyem, 7, to Russia alone

RT: Russia-America TV Interview 3/10

Korean Birthmothers Protest to End Adoption

Motherhood, Adoption, Surrender, & Loss

Who Am I?

Bitter Winds

Adoption and Truth Video

Adoption Truth

Birthparents Never Forget