tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post467413530719597089..comments2023-12-26T19:43:01.770-08:00Comments on FAMILY PRESERVATION not Adoption Separaration: WIN FOR GRAYSON & BEN!!Mirah Ribenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13626873757236976251noreply@blogger.comBlogger51125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-31772589754864801842010-11-15T18:56:52.608-08:002010-11-15T18:56:52.608-08:00anonymous said to anonymous...
Do you think you c...anonymous said to anonymous...<br /><br />Do you think you could at least identify yourselves and anon 1 and anon 2 so we can tell if it is not the same person?Mirah Ribenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13626873757236976251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-967513880493078342010-11-15T18:54:22.714-08:002010-11-15T18:54:22.714-08:00I see we are getting somewhere......didn't tak...I see we are getting somewhere......didn't take long for you all to show your true colors! Night!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-9710452180435840592010-11-15T17:57:58.389-08:002010-11-15T17:57:58.389-08:00That was a knee slapper, trying to bring Obama int...That was a knee slapper, trying to bring Obama into it! OMG! I SOOOO needed a laugh tonight!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-45065605933861329222010-11-15T15:37:00.655-08:002010-11-15T15:37:00.655-08:00Anon, hiding behind anonymity is a cowardly thing ...Anon, hiding behind anonymity is a cowardly thing to do. Those who do so invariably are cowards in the end. I challenge you to find one lie told by any supporter of Mr. Wrembeck and his family. I on the other hand can right now point out at least one lie from your side of this debate. I suggest you have a lot to learn- I suggest you all take off the rose colored glasses and let the clear light of day invade your minds. None of what has happened is Mr. Wyrembecks fault, I lay blame right where it belongs, with the Vaughn's and their attornies. If they had done the right thing to begin with that child would not have been traumatized again- yes, you read that right. I said traumatized again. The first trauma was losing his mother at birth, and being handed to a complete genetic stranger instead. I have said it more than once now-if Mr. Wyrembeck is such a terrible person and unfit prove it. Provide the evidence of it. In other words it's time to PUT UP, OR SHUT UP!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02294355793865435862noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-42928243959699357142010-11-15T09:05:33.895-08:002010-11-15T09:05:33.895-08:00I am ROFL laughing! Slander requies a lie. I am te...I am ROFL laughing! Slander requies a lie. I am telling the truth and you have been LYING!<br /><br />1. Ben was not required to pay any support prior to knowing if the child was his, which required a DNA test that the Vaughns blocked till they were forced to...and then the wait for the results.<br /><br />2. After that was determined they refused his requests for visits.<br /><br />It's all in the court records.<br /><br />had he abandoned his son as you claim he would have lost. He won. You lost. <br /><br />It's sad. It's not easy after all that was invested. but as has been said, they gambled. They lost. It's that simple. They need to help their two kids heal from this instead of prolonging it more.Mirah Ribenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13626873757236976251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-40869077899913095202010-11-14T14:01:10.570-08:002010-11-14T14:01:10.570-08:00Careful Mirah....I think it is YOU that may be sue...Careful Mirah....I think it is YOU that may be sued for SLANDER! What a complete JOKE you and all of your followers are!! I am guessing most of you are also Obama supporters as you have such HATE in your heart to those that have worked their @#$@#$ off to become "affluent" as you would say!! For crying out loud......get a life and let GRAYSON be your focus NOT SLANDER!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-53058817855311628402010-11-14T10:11:31.720-08:002010-11-14T10:11:31.720-08:00From David Houston:
"When you file 3 years w...From David Houston:<br /><br />"When you file 3 years worth of frivolous and meritless litigation you need to pay for the damages you have caused. And I think that is great because people like the Vaughns need to be held accountable under our laws, just like the rest of us are. When you cause unjustified damage to others in violation of their rights, you should expect to be sued. The poor Wyrembek family would just like to live in peace and raise their child have some privacy...<br /><br />"The Vaughns will never give up on taking Ben’s son, because they will never know that he is safe. No court, judge or evidence can convince them of that. So those of us that believe fit parents like Ben should be allowed to raise their children in peace without interference by people like the Vaughns have to consider more drastic steps, like lawsuits, harassment charges, restraining orders and the like. The Vaughns give us no choice as they cannot be reasoned with. <br /> <br />"Sad that Christy Vaughn still does not comprehend that she never had an adoptive child and that Ben’s son was never her child. And no Christy, it was not God that put Ben’s son in your arms. It was Drucilla Bocvarov and a hospital worker; neither of which was God."<br /><br />AND:<br /><br />**** "When you cause unjustified damage to others in violation of their rights, you should expect to be sued. The poor Wyrembek family would just like to live in peace and raise their child have some privacy and I cannot blame them for that. If and when any member of the Wyrembek family wants to hear from a Vaughn, they know how to contact you. Leave them alone." ****Mirah Ribenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13626873757236976251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-71788569002604823532010-11-14T09:45:19.412-08:002010-11-14T09:45:19.412-08:00Let's talk about Grayson. His rights and his b...Let's talk about Grayson. His rights and his best interest.<br /><br />Every child born has an unalienable right to be with their family, unless that family is found to be harmful to them. Period! Your kids have that right, mine do, and so does Ben's son, Grayson.<br /><br />It is absolutely in Grayson's best interest to be raised by blood kin over strangers! And that goes equally for IMPERFECT parents!<br /><br />Why do you think social services in every states works toward that goal first before terminating parental rights? It is not to be done lightly...and never because someone else wants the child!! That is never a reason! Which is of course why Vaughn supporters are trying to trump up "cause." but have nada, zip, zero.Mirah Ribenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13626873757236976251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-10993662155374829712010-11-14T09:18:48.403-08:002010-11-14T09:18:48.403-08:00Mandy,
One of the reason there is so much fear is...Mandy,<br /><br />One of the reason there is so much fear is that it is being fed intentionally or unintentionally by the media that keep identifying the vuaghns incorrectly as grayson's "adoptive parent.s" Some reporst i have read have said that they adopted this boy thre eyears ago and now the father has come back to claim him! <br /><br />I searched news articles and many do not name Ben, but identify him only as "the biological father."<br /><br />All of this adds to lopsisded invalid, biased reporting that scres people who beleive whatt hey rea din the newspapers!<br /><br />Ben has not been the media whore the Vaughns have bene so their side of the story has beenheard FAR FAR more yielding them and their lying version of the facts many supporters who are blind to the truth and wish to stay that way: don;t confuse me the facts!<br /><br />Some, who have heard the truth have left their camp. Orgers see only the 1950s BS that a child is "better off" siwth a MARRIED coule - a couple who by all odds has a 50/50 chance or remainign married, and probably far less given the stress they inflicted on themselves. ben, on the other hand, has every possibility of marrying, and whether he does or not is no one's business. He has extended family support and Grayson will be very cherished and well cared for. Grayson has grandparents and likely aunts uncles and cousins! he is with them now. he is wit family. He is safe. Give it up.<br /><br />But you need to know that still to this day people are rehashing and arguing on my Blog about just such a contested adoption that took place in the 1960s. Yes. over 40 years ago. That was not a typo!<br /><br />Go here to see the most recent comments on this blog post follow up on the case of baby Jessica and the DeBoers:<br /><br />familypreservation.blogspot.com/.../baby-jessica-in-new-again.htmlMirah Ribenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13626873757236976251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-31872523715413816022010-11-14T08:58:56.798-08:002010-11-14T08:58:56.798-08:00Thank you Mandy and Dan.
Mandy you spelled the fa...Thank you Mandy and Dan.<br /><br />Mandy you spelled the facts out very well. But these MORONS ask why Ben didn't support her while she was married and pregnant and why he didn't try to visit his son while they were holding him illegally and fighting him every step of the way - preventing him from even being DNA tested! Yeah, you're really going to seek to sit down and have tea with people who are disallowing you to even get to step one and prove the child they are coveted is yours?? <br /><br />Would any of these people - or any sane person (maybe not one and the same) - have done any of the asinine things they are suggesting Ben should have? <br /><br />Ben acted with dignity and within the law. the Vaughns did not. Period. He's right; they are wrong, wrong, wrong...always have been and still are. No amount of tears of mud slinging at Ben will ever change that!<br /><br />Give it up! Loose with SOME dignity?Mirah Ribenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13626873757236976251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-7769613333835505052010-11-14T08:28:07.638-08:002010-11-14T08:28:07.638-08:00I so have to wonder how many PAPs, adopters, adopt...I so have to wonder how many PAPs, adopters, adoption agency owners, agency reps, adoption attorneys and social workers compromise the 7000+ supporters on the KGH site???? Methinks that site is top-heavy with PAPs and adopters. A case like this scares the crap out of them. Once upon a time it was the image of the Boogie-Lady Birthmother showing up on their Savior Doorsteps, that scared the crap out of adopters...in a time when father's had next to nil rights to claim their own children. Times do change and now more fathers are claiming their parental rights to their own children, when the mother surrenders her parental rights. All children have TWO parents when they are conceived and born (well at least the old-fashioned way)...PRIOR to any adoption. In this case Drucilla surrendered her parental rights, Ben did not...therefore by law he does have the right to demand custody of HIS child. And this ridiculous argument of Ben being involved with Drucilla while she was pg...for God's sake KGH supporters...she was legally married to another man!!! I'm not judging Drucilla for having an affair with a single man while she was still married...but when a pregnancy occurs (conceived with the man of the affair), sure can make things quite messy...and messy this was right from the outset. Drucilla was already a mother to a 15 yr old son, when she gave birth to her 2nd son. Drucilla was in debt to her eyeballs and was filing bankruptcy with a divorce on the horizon. Drucilla was in a mess long before her baby was born. Still the fact remained Ben did what he had to do has required by law, as the FATHER of this baby that he strongly suspected he was. He could not support the fetus, not knowing for sure if he was the father or not, while the fetus was in utero. SOOOOOO...when the baby was born he signed up with the Putative Father Registry. He also quite immediately then requested a DNA test of the baby...which was now held in captivity by the The Vaughns. They DID NOT allow the DNA test to be done immediately. They stalled for just over a year..finally a court-order was issued for the DNA test. The Vaughns' hindered Ben and the courts hindered Ben in his immediate quest for a DNA test. The man was doing what he was supposed to be doing..but the Vaughn's were intent to delay, stall and ignore the rights Ben had to his own child. The court system is equally at fault, for dragging their feet, for allowing this case to be interminally dragged out. Once the DNA was in, and no legal reason to keep his son from him...the courts themselves should have held these people in contempt, if these people did not comply, they should have been arrested and jailed and the authorities should have went in and physically removed this little boy from these people who were holding a child in their home...who were not the legal parents, who had no legal right to keep this child in their home. Am I sounding heartless about this child...no I truly am not. I am a mother of 4 now adult children and a grandmother. But when people are holding captive a legal parent's child, then drastic measures must be taken to remove the child from the captors...immediately...and not years later. This case has really shown just how entitled so many adoptors really feel about keeping stranger children in their homes, irregardless of laws. They want what they want when they want it. The Vaughns, their family (especially Jon Riggs and Phyllis Vaughn) and many of their supporters, sound like a huge room of children having one gigantic temper tantrum...kicking and screaming all the way. So sad...especially for this poor kid and for all natural parents who only want to love and raise their OWN children.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08977718419475148796noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-59426534335719338402010-11-14T08:09:49.207-08:002010-11-14T08:09:49.207-08:00I contend that both sides wanted to win.
However,...I contend that both sides wanted to win.<br /><br />However, one side has nature, God (if you prefer), and the law all on his side. He is a total victim here. He has done no wrong since learning he had a child but seek proper recourse in the law.<br /><br />The other side has violated court orders, courted the press like Paris Hilton doing a sex tape - only with their KIDS! - and is coveting and harboring a child like a possession that they want. They want what they want like a child or a drug addict. They refuse to accept truth or reality or the law. They are stubborn, greedy and at this point quite pathetic. They are causing harm to their own two kids to fight for a child that IS NOT THEIRS!<br /><br />Steph, you scoff at the fact that Ben never relinquished his parental rights. How would you feel if someone simply snatched you child in the supermarket and refused to give him back. Said, you weren't watching your child for that few seconds and that gives him the rights, cause you were being a bad mother at that moment!<br /><br />Give me a break! We do not take or keep another's child when that person has not volunraily relinquished their rights or had their rights terminated because of abuse. That is not and never was the case here. You had a case where one parent wanted one thing for their child and the other parent wanted another. The two parents had equal say and while one is allowed to abdicate their rights, the other chose not to, thus maintaining SOLE rights to the child, Grayson. What is so hard to understand here?<br /><br />He is Grayson's father. Always was and always will be. What is so hard to understand. His rights were never terminated. And no matter how many parking tickets or other offenses he has against him in the past does not change that!! I have told you umpteen times people serving jail sentences for felonies maintain custody of their children. Women give birth while serving prison sentences and maintain custody. Committing a crime, in and of itself, does not deem one unfit to parent. get it through your heads! And more importantly nothing you say will make it happen.Mirah Ribenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13626873757236976251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-54806820944887727972010-11-14T07:34:42.391-08:002010-11-14T07:34:42.391-08:00Mind boggling!! What matters is the life of this ...Mind boggling!! What matters is the life of this innocent child...This transcends which adult wronged which more or which adults' rights were most violated. The focus of all adults involved should be how can Grayson be LEAST wronged...until all concerned find a way to make Grayson a winner in this EVERYONE loses, most of all Grayson.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-57333719912392114222010-11-14T07:30:45.557-08:002010-11-14T07:30:45.557-08:00Absolutely mindboggling!! What matters is the life...Absolutely mindboggling!! What matters is the life of this innocent child and no one should settle for anything less...This transcends which adult wronged which more or which adults' rights were most violated. The focus of all adults involved should be how can Grayson be LEAST wronged...until all concerned find a way to make Grayson a winner in this EVERYONE loses, most of all Grayson.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-20505217073994395212010-11-14T05:30:53.140-08:002010-11-14T05:30:53.140-08:00Steph and Megan, funny thing about "supportin...Steph and Megan, funny thing about "supporting the bmom"... especially when the bmom's HUSBAND doesn't want you or any reminder of you around.<br />SHE was the one having sex outside of HER marriage. You keep forgetting that part when decrying his "lack of support to the bmom".<br />HER HUSBAND NEVER claimed Grayson as his son, he wanted rid of the reminder that his WIFE fucked around behind his back.<br />SHE had no right to keep Ben out of HIS son's life any more than the Vaughns.<br />SHE used Grayson as punishment to Ben for not doing what SHE wanted.<br />How doe you thing GOD felt about that?<br /><br />As for the Vaughns, they KNEW from day one that Grayson's true FATHER wanted to raise him.<br />They KNEW that the courts had denied their adoption petition. They KNEW that the court had ORDERED Grayson returned to his rightful FATHER.<br />THEY KNEW ALL OF THIS but continued to carry the fight for what THEY WANTED.<br /><br />They, their attorneys, and the adoption agency are ALL complicit in the kidnapping and holding hostage of GRAYSON WYREMBECK for 3 years.<br />They ALL defied the courts ruling, KNOWING the facts (that they so conveniently leave out when talking to the media.<br /><br />Grayson is HOME where he belongs.<br />This episode in his life will affect him for life. He will find the truth when he's able to understand and want to know the TRUTH. He will see how he was held hostage by an "affluent" couple who violated court orders for 3 years, keeping him from his own father.<br />HE will make his own decision as to who acted in his best interest.<br />7000 or 7500 internet friends of the Vaughns that wanted to keep him separated from his TRUE FATHER will keep him aware that others do not hold his best interest as priority above their own wants.Dan Harrisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-5114051594563137522010-11-13T20:39:12.435-08:002010-11-13T20:39:12.435-08:00It is getting impossible. Vaughn supporters are te...It is getting impossible. Vaughn supporters are tending to spew the same ole same ole - sometimes I think they copy and paste each others comments and post them. <br />Facts are facts and they can't change them just because they want to in order to further the Vaughn's cause.<br />Now they are resorting to slandering Grayson's father.<br />After this last attempt the Vaughns are making with yet another adoption petition it will all go to rest and Grayson can live a wonderful and peaceful and fulfilling life with is real family.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-23064846119074159712010-11-13T20:22:48.626-08:002010-11-13T20:22:48.626-08:00WHOA!! Grayson was never adopted, Steph! And you k...WHOA!! Grayson was never adopted, Steph! And you know it.<br /><br />And here you go again, talking out of both sides of your mouth at once:<br /><br />He abandoned her - she rejected him for alleged abuses. ROFL once again!<br /><br />And you KNOW he was barred from any contact with the Vaughns! But, do you really think Jaycee's parents are interested in hearing about her life from her captors? Do you think Elizabeth Smart's parents are? he did what he needed to do to get his son back! Nothing more and nothing less. he acted with far more dignity than the cry-baby Vaughns who exploited their own children in their unending - STILL ongoing - media WHORING!!<br /><br />Really Steph - and Megan - you are wasting your time here. Have you not figured that out yet? You are not convincing anyone here with your utter BULL. Go sell it somewhere else! Sell it to someone naive enough and who knows nothing about this case or adoption...or for that matter knows nothing about common decency and morality!<br /><br />You have your firm beliefs and we are not going to change your mind, nor you ours! <br /><br />So, for the umpteenth time: GIVE IT UP!<br /><br />You are not going to change the court's decsion no matter what you say -- or believe!!!!<br /><br />I think on that note, I just may close comments here...this is really getting very old, tiring and repetitive and it is totally unproductive.Mirah Ribenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13626873757236976251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-46086323305438515772010-11-13T20:06:44.625-08:002010-11-13T20:06:44.625-08:00"If the best interests of the child is to be ..."If the best interests of the child is to be the determining factor in child custody cases persons seeking babies to adopt might profitably frequent grocery stores and snatch babies from carts when the parent is looking the other way. Then, if custody proceedings can be delayed long enough, they can assert that they have a nicer home, a superior education, a better job or whatever, and that the best interests of the child are with the baby snatchers. Children of parents living in public housing or other conditions deemed less affluent and children of single parents might be considered particularly fair game." -- Justice James Heiple, Illinois Supreme Court in the "Baby Richard" case."Mirah Ribenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13626873757236976251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-24723107737339653032010-11-13T20:03:13.026-08:002010-11-13T20:03:13.026-08:00Its all about winning not about the child with the...Its all about winning not about the child with the Vaughns!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-27048359780156187962010-11-13T19:55:25.949-08:002010-11-13T19:55:25.949-08:00Thanks for pointing out that Ben never surrendered...Thanks for pointing out that Ben never surrendered his rights. That is probably the crux of the matter. Ben was acutely aware the child was his - he attended an ultrasound with the birthmum. after that, during the balance of the pregnancy Ben chose not to support the birthmum. Whether she shunned him given his aggressive nature is another topic all together. Once Ben understood Grayson had been born - and adopted - Ben then failed to support him emotionally or financially. He chose to litigate. Now if he expressed interest in his sons wellbeing or development, milestones etc. over the months it took to validate parentage, I would certainly hold the Vaughns culpable here. But I cannot; that didn’t happen either. The Vaughn’s are not hard to contact; look at all the media that has found them for heaven sake! But I digress. Ben made decisions to litigate rather than even attempt to have a civil conversation in the best interest of this child from the get go. The child was abandoned by his biodad and surrendered by his birthmum. Having said this, combined with Bens substantial history with law enforcement, how anxious would anyone be to simply hand over an innocent child? The birthmum wasn’t. Should this have been a custody battle between Ben and the birthmum? Perhaps so. But Ben chose to wait and make his claim after the baby was adopted by people with resources. Very clever indeed. 400K USD clever. Poor Grayson.Stephnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-77734197737977279782010-11-13T19:47:28.848-08:002010-11-13T19:47:28.848-08:00In fact, just think - if fathers aren't allowe...In fact, just think - if fathers aren't allowed to prevent an adoption the mother wants, and the mother manages to get the child into the physical custody of pontential adoptive parents - those if you that support the Vaughns, do you not realize your son, brother, grandson, nephew, etc could lose his child to someone who can claim to have a richer, nicer, two parent home? And if you say "Well, my relative is deserving of his child, or a better person than the father in this case, etc" it doesn't matter - because the damage from setting the legal precedent that what the father wants doesn't matter will have already been done!Rebecca Hermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12045279026055038231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-56871541544991051292010-11-13T19:33:07.700-08:002010-11-13T19:33:07.700-08:00Ya' gotta love it!
Drucilla's wishes and ...Ya' gotta love it!<br /><br />Drucilla's wishes and right to decide as Grayson's mother should be honored.<br /><br />BVut Ben has no equal right to make decisions or have rights as his father!<br /><br />It's too hysterical!! You couldn't win in court, and you aint winning here with that kind of double talk and circular "reasoning."<br /><br />It's comical! Listen to yourselves. Do you hear how nonsensical you are being?Mirah Ribenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13626873757236976251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-2094255300964355652010-11-13T19:19:12.172-08:002010-11-13T19:19:12.172-08:00It does not matter if the Vaughns are wonderful pa...It does not matter if the Vaughns are wonderful parents, what matters is whether the law allows them to be considered for having custody of Grayson. And right now, that is not possible unless both biological parents terminate their rights, or the rights are terminated by unfitness. And Ben was not found unfit, therefore legally the Vaughns simply cannot be allowed to adopt him. Could you imagine the horrific legal precedent if they got their way? How many families would be hurt? If you want a child even if things weren't done properly all you have to do is hold physical custody long enough, say you have a nicer 2 parent home more money etc - you cannot see why this is WRONG?<br /><br />The fact of the matter is: <br />The Vaughns chose to fight a contested adoption, bonding to the child, allowing the child to bond to their family, knowing that they might lose. During this time, they refused visitation with the biological father, ensuring that if they lost in court, Grayson would have to be handed over to a stranger instead of someone he would have spent every weekend with for over a year.Rebecca Hermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12045279026055038231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-8862211726594214382010-11-13T19:11:01.903-08:002010-11-13T19:11:01.903-08:00As an aside I was doing some research on memory an...As an aside I was doing some research on memory and stumbled upong this- <br /><br />"And no, simply showing us the correct information doesn't fix it. Quite the opposite: research shows tha...t once we've seized on an incorrect piece of information, exposure to the facts either doesn't change what we think, or makes us even more likely to hold onto the false information. You can guess why this is: our self-image triumphs over all. It's more important that we continue to think of ourselves as infallible than admit we're wrong." That would explain the stubborness of the KGH supporters and their views!See MoreAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02294355793865435862noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-39960591221546378342010-11-13T19:09:39.573-08:002010-11-13T19:09:39.573-08:00Anon- you make the case for us. Simply because you...Anon- you make the case for us. Simply because you wish it to be true, does not make it true. You say we don't know Mr Wyrembeck, neither do you. All you know is what you have been spoon fed by KGH. Certainly this is a distressing case, this child did nothing to deserve what happened. You all keep saying that Drucilla had the right to choose this for Grayson. You say this based on innuendo and suppostions made by others. But the fact of the matter is this, Mr. Wyrembeck never surrendered his rights. Because this is so he has the legal right to parent his son. You are the ones who are out of their minds. You have lied, defamed and outright slandered the Wyrembeck family in the name of your cause! You all disgust me-Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02294355793865435862noreply@blogger.com