tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post2115660487522470881..comments2023-12-26T19:43:01.770-08:00Comments on FAMILY PRESERVATION not Adoption Separaration: Debbie Rowe Heading for a Row Over Kids?Mirah Ribenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13626873757236976251noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2384966947084602158.post-47189485252011597782009-07-08T21:34:48.396-07:002009-07-08T21:34:48.396-07:00That's a tough one. On one hand, she's the...That's a tough one. On one hand, she's the kids' natural mother. On the other hand, she only had her kids for the sole purpose of selling them.<br />My opinion: Considering that she sold her children, I don't think she should have any rights over them whatsoever. On the flip side, I think that the children SHOULD have every right to see her if THEY decide to, and that she owes them any information and/or explanations that they ask of her.<br />I think that the question of who the children live with now should definitely take into account, their wishes, as well as their best interests - particularly ensuring that all 3 of them are kept together and not separated from each other. They've already lost too much.Lori Pringlehttp://members.shaw.ca/LoriPringlenoreply@blogger.com